Monday, February 4, 2019

Kia Ceed Sportswagon review

http://bit.ly/2HQgxWD

For 
Comfortable and refined
Build quality and specs
7-Year warranty
Our Rating 
4
Against 
Noisier than the hatch
Not much fun to drive
Less of a bargain than before
Kia Ceed Sportswgaon - front
2019

Does the Kia Ceed SW Estate – or Sportswagon – live up to the promise of the five-door hatch?

The Kia Ceed Sportswagon is a roomy family estate that’s worth considering if you’re in the market for a competent compact family hatchback-based hauler. It has just about as much room in the back as a Ford Focus Estate or Volkswagen Golf Estate, and drives well enough to keep most owners happy with either diesel or three-cylinder petrol power. With good equipment levels on offer too, and a comfortable and high quality interior, there’s not a lot to actively criticise.

One downside is that more volume in the back means there’s a little more interior noise when the load bay is empty, and the Ceed generally is not an especially thrilling drive. As Kia becomes more mainstream the price gap between it and more traditional choices narrows, too.

4 Feb, 2019
3.8

Kia continues its march upmarket, but high spec and lots of tech doesn’t hide occasionally low rent trim 

Although there’s a bit more sparkle in the cabin due to a small trim changes and chrome effect detailing, the interior of the new Ceed is identical to that of the previous version. That means you get a swooping dashboard that looks contemporary and attractive, with the controls laid out sensibly. The central touchscreen is carried over too, and it’s just as easy and intuitive to use. The most significant change to the new model is the extra connectivity so you get traffic updates for the sat-nav, speed camera warnings and search functionality.

Overall the feel is one of quality, but there are one or two applications of cheap hard plastic that you wouldn’t find in a leading European rival.

The exterior of the new Ceed Sportswagon is very close in design to the regular hatch, apart from the extended roofline and rear overhang mentioned previously. All models look respectable with body-colour bumpers and alloy wheels, body-colour door handles and mirrors plus chrome window surrounds and roof rails – there’s no ‘poverty spec’. Projector-style headlamps give a contemporary feel up front, and the lavishly equipped First Edition adds LED headlamps and cornering lights.

Sat-nav, stereo and infotainment

The seven-inch standard or eight-inch navigation touchscreens in more luxurious models are brightly illuminated with good clarity, and straightforward to use with intuitive menus. The ‘connected’ services are included for the same seven-year period as the Kia warranty, which is good news too.

All models get a decent six-speaker audio set up with DAB radio, USB and aux connectors, as well as Apple CarPlay and Android Auto with voice control. Top spec First Edition models get an upgraded JBL eight-speaker stereo and also benefit from the addition of wireless phone charging.

3.5

The driving attributes of the Ceed SW are very similar to those of the hatchback, which is what you’d expect as the cars are to all intents and purposes identical under the skin. There’s no reduction in stability or grip, and nothing in the handling characteristics to suggest you’re paying a penalty for the extra luggage space tacked on the back.

It’s worth noting that the 16-inch alloys give the Ceed SW a more comfortable and pliant ride than the sporty looking 17 inchers, and the latter do introduce an element of harshness to the ride quality that can be annoying. In fact, it’s fair to say the Ceed in all guises is a little less comfort-focused than before, but it feels stable and composed on twisty roads.

There’s no doubt there are other estate cars in the same segment that are more fun to drive, but for owners who prioritise practicality and comfort over sporty chassis responses, the Ceed’s handling will be more than satisfactory.

Engines, 0-60 acceleration and top speed

The Kia Ceed has an engine line-up that’s competitive with key rivals, and high mileage drivers can opt for the 1.6-litre four-cylinder diesel engine that will whisk the Sportswagon to 62mph in 10.7 seconds. Top speed is 119mph, which is similar to the performance offered by VW Group equivalents such as the Golf Estate or SEAT Leon ST.

There’s more choice in the petrol line-up, and we’d favour the 1.0-litre T-GDI with its 118bhp output. It’s enough for a 10.9 second 0-62mph time, which is hardly electrifying but power is delivered smoothly. The 1.4-litre T-GDi petrol may be a better bet if you’re going to use the Stationwagon’s load-lugging ability regularly, as it gets a noticeable 20bhp power boost. It delivers 0-62mph in 8.8 seconds – and you can also have it with a seven-speed dual-clutch auto. All other models have only a six-speed manual option.

4.4

With the brand recording an eight-place finish in the 2018 Driver Power owner satisfaction survey, Kia owners can be more confident that their choice of brand won’t leave them stranded, although the previous generation car dropped down the rankings to 61st out of the top 75-finishing cars with a relatively high incidence of electrical faults.

The hatchback has been tested by Euro NCAP and presents the expected five-star rating. There’s plenty of safety kit, and even the entry model Stationwagon gets Lane Keeping Assist, Forward Collision Warning and optional City Braking. All cars also get stability control. ABS, Hill-Start Assist and Tyre Pressure Monitoring. Top spec First Edition models add Blind Spot Warning and standard-fit City Braking, as well as Speed Limit Recognition and Lane Following Assistance on dual-clutch auto versions.

The roster of passive safety kit includes twin front airbags, and twin side and curtain airbags. There are latest top-tether ISOFIX child seat mounts in the rear, and a front passenger airbag cut-off switch so you can use a child seat in front.

Warranty

You really can’t fault the Kia Warranty offer, which is leagues ahead of most rivals with a full seven years of cover up to 100,00 miles. The first three years include unlimited mileage. You also get one year’s free roadside assistance.

Servicing

Kia offers two servicing packages, called Care 3 and Care 3 Plus. These packages are for three and five years respectively and cost around £300 or £600 for all-inclusive maintenance – wear and tear items excepted.

4.5

The roomy boot is a key selling point for the Kia Ceed Sportswagon, which, in spite of its name is definitely one of the more practical options in the compact estate sector. The latest Ceed is wider and longer than its predecessor meaning there’s more space for occupants too.

Designers have allowed plenty of storage for oddments with decent door bins and a roomy glovebox, while you also get two cupholders in the practical cabin.

The driving position offers plenty of adjustment too, with lots of movement in the seat and steering wheel suggesting all shapes and sizes should be comfortable.

Size

The estate version of the Kia Ceed is 4,600mm long, which is a noticeable extension over the hatchback at around 4,300mm long.

Leg room, head room & passenger space

The bigger volume of the latest Ceed bodyshell means occupants at the front and rear both benefit from more space. There’s more headroom up front, and a little more shoulder room for passengers in the rear. 

Boot

The Kia Ceed Sportswagon’s boot is not only large, but it’s a well thought-out installation too. It has a storage area under the floor for valuables or rarely needed items, and there’s an optional luggage rail system that’s fitted as standard to the luxurious First Edition.

The rear seat folds 60:40 in the standard model, while higher trim levels get a 40:20:40 split for added convenience, and there are levers in the boot to operate the seat backs. There’s a low loading lip, and with 600-litres of luggage volume it’s a viable competitor for the Golf and Skoda Octavia Estates.

Towing capacity is reasonable too, with both the 1.6 diesel and 1.0 petrol rated for 1,200kg braked trailers. The 1.4 engine is only rated for 1,000kg.

4.2

There are only three engine choices in the Sportswagon, and all of them are relatively efficient with no real performance options available. As a result you can expect them all to be cheap to run.

The most economical petrol is the 1.0-litre, which under the latest WLTP measurement regime offers up to 47.1mpg. The 1.4-litre petrol returns up to 44.8mpg, while the 1.6-litre diesel returns up to 58.9mpg, so you’d need to do quite a few miles to make the diesel a cost-effective option. CO2 emissions are 137g/km for the smallest petrol and 127g/km for the diesel, with the 1.4 petrol the worst offender at up to 143g/km of CO2.

Insurance groups

There won’t be many shocks on the insurance front for Kia Ceed Sportswagon owners, as the insurance groups are competitive and pretty low. The cheapest models to insure will be the 1.0-litre petrols which fall into groups 12 or 13 depending on spec. The 1.6-litre diesel has a group 15 insurance ranking, while the costliest to insure will be the 1.4 petrol which is rated at group 18. That still makes the Ceed less expensive to insure than some superminis.

Depreciation

Secondhand values of the Kia Ceed range are expected to be reasonable, and pretty close to mainstream European rivals like the Ford Focus or Vauxhall Astra. The last generation Ceed hatch residuals were decent at 42-47 per cent for petrol models, and 36-44 per cent for diesels – all at three years/30,000 miles. We’d expect the new generation car to do better, as it’s better equipped and better built. Estate models should retain a small extra percentage of value too, thanks to their extra usefulness.  



from Featured Articles http://bit.ly/2RCPRYX

Sunday, February 3, 2019

'The best car ever made doesn't even exist'

http://bit.ly/2t5sZaJ

Mike Rutherford 2019-02-03 13:00

The best car can't be named or driven as it is a car that simply doesn't exist, says Mike Rutherford

OPINION best car

“What’s the best car ever?” is a question I’m often asked, but don’t have an answer for – because such a vehicle doesn’t exist. After four decades driving thousands of motors, however, I’ve concluded THE best for today’s buyers is one that serves up the best of two worlds; offers a bit of both; is two (or more) cars in one.

You might think you need an urban car to commute in the week, then a separate off-roader for Saturday or Sunday fun in the country or at the beach. You don’t. What you need is a 3.5 metre-long Suzuki Jimny 4x4, at less than half the price of the cheapest Land Rover.

Best SUVs and 4x4s to buy

Similarly, if you have Champagne tastes but a tap water budget, join the masses and accept you can’t afford to buy or run that supercar you crave. So forget about the Ferrari costing hundreds of thousands and buy a used Hyundai CoupĂ© V6 for a grand or two. It looks like, and is, a poor man’s supercar-lite. Crucially, unlike Italian dream cars, it’s great for gentle sprints to work, the shops, the tip, or wherever you fancy. 

Reckon you require a vehicle with a tin roof 300 days a year, then a rag top for the remaining 65? Wrong. You need a convertible hard-top. And why suffer all the expense and storage hassles of a classic motor in addition to a contemporary car, when you can instead go for something in between? A £10,000 used Porsche Boxster, perhaps. It’ll offer the very best of both worlds, being both a stylish modern classic, and a highly usable daily car about town. The fact the Boxster borders on supercar status is the icing on the cake.

No need to choose between a light commercial vehicle and a car, either. There are countless ‘vancars’ on sale, with my favourite being the latest version of the Peugeot Rifter/Citroen Berlingo. These are proper Swiss Army knives on wheels.

Vans or motorhomes as short-stay living quarters? Go for the former; the latter can be absurdly expensive. Then, come short holiday or three-day festival time, convert the van (preferably a VW Transporter  or Peugeot Boxer) into a makeshift motorhome simply by chucking in a sofa bed, collapsible table and chairs, portable sink, stove and wardrobe. The crude shower and portaloo are best housed outside in tall tents, though. 

And if you only need a bed for a night, or two at a push, while spending a weekend at a summer music fest, beach, Grand Prix, Goodwood or Le Mans, a large 4x4 or family estate car with its rear seats flattened can serve as a double bed (well, sort of) where occupants are able to grab some kip for a few hours. When I drove from London to Miami (via Iceland, Greenland, Canada) in a Jeep Commander a decade ago, the bulletproof 4x4 was not only my preferred mode of transport, but also my life-saving hotel room, and one far more comfortable, warmer and safer to sleep in than an exposed tent. 

Most important of all, are you torn between a pure-petrol or pure-electric car? For the next year or two at least, go petrol-electric instead. Such vehicles are becoming increasingly attractive and affordable to fund, run and refuel/recharge. Mind you, there is something better and even more flexible than a petrol-electric car, and that’s a petrol-electric van.

Do you agree with Mike? Let us know what you think in the comments below...



from Featured Articles http://bit.ly/2HOaAJM

Saturday, February 2, 2019

Nissan pulls X-Trail production from UK

http://bit.ly/2WvPiUm

Hugo Griffiths 2019-02-03 00:45

Nissan will cancel planned X-Trail production in Sunderland; Brexit woes combine with diesel anxiety in reversal of 2016 decision

Nissan X-Trail Platinum Edition - front

Nissan is expected to announce on Monday it will not move production of its X-Trail SUV from Japan to Sunderland, reversing a decision made in 2016. 

Five months after the 2016 referendum, Nissan received assurances from the British Government no additional tariffs or diplomatic red tape would be placed upon it as a result of the leave vote. Partly as a result of those assurances, the car maker committed to build the latest-generation Qashqai in Sunderland, and shift X-Trail production to the plant as well. Those decisions were seen as a pre-emptive vote of confidence in post-Brexit UK.

Sources speaking to Sky News, however, indicate Nissan will go back on the X-Trail decision, keeping its production in Asia – though the Qashqai, the smaller Juke SUV, and the electric Leaf will continue to be built at the Sunderland plant. No jobs are expected to be lost as a result of the X-Trail decision - though none are likely to be created, either.

Critics were quick to hold Nissan’s reported decision up as an example of the Brexit malaise said to be gripping car companies ahead of the UK’s departure from the EU on 29 March, but the true reasons behind it are likely to more numerous than Brexit alone. 

Nissan produced 10.7 per cent fewer cars in the UK last year than they did in 2017, for example. The X-Trail is also a relatively large SUV and is well-paired with a diesel engine, however sales of diesel-engined cars declined by almost 30 per cent in 2018. Finally, while the Qashqai has been a huge success for its maker, the larger X-Trail far less common sight on UK roads.

Are you sad to Nissan reverse its decision to build the X-Trail in the UK? Let us know your thoughts below... 



from Featured Articles http://bit.ly/2Rxg237

Ford Capri: a history 1969 to 1986

http://bit.ly/2MNsWZY

Luke Wilkinson 2019-02-02 15:00

The Ford Capri retains a special place in the hearts of car fans. 50 years on, we look back at what made it great.

ford capri mk1

The Ford Capri was designed as the European equivalent of the Ford Mustang. First unveiled to the public in 1969, it was marketed as a cheap, fast and fun two-plus-two coupe, aimed at the blue-collar working man. It was a highly successful model for Ford, remaining in production well into the eighties, and selling almost 1.9-million units across its 17-year production run.

Marketed under the tagline “the car you’ve always promised yourself,” the Capri enjoyed huge success across Europe and the UK during its lifetime, and still maintains a strong fan-base to this day. It celebrates its 50th anniversary in 2019, so we thought we’d take a canter through the Ford Capri’s history and give you a run-down of its illustrious past.

First generation Ford Capri (1969 – 1974)

The Capri entered its design phase in 1965, a collaborative effort between Ford’s German and British divisions. Originally due to be named the Colt (as a nod to its big brother, the Mustang), it was penned to attract a younger audience, with its long bonnet, short tail and fake air vents in the rear wings.

Ford invested a total of £20 million in the project. The first car was completed in 1968, followed by a two-month production run prior to the official release date to ensure every Ford dealer forecourt had a Capri on show in time for its big debut. During this preliminary production run, Ford spent time in court with Mitsubishi, arguing about the rights to the Colt monika. Ford lost the case, forcing them to change the car’s name to the “Capri” for its official debut at the 1969 Brussels Motor Show.

Like the Mustang, which was built on the same platform as the more practical Ford Falcon saloon, the first-generation Capri was built on the same platform as the MkII Cortina, in order to keep costs down. Priced at £890 from launch, it had a live axle with leaf-springs and drum brakes at the rear, MacPherson struts with disc brakes at the front and a four-speed all-synchromesh gearbox as standard.

Also, like the Mustang, the Capri had a large range of engines, which started with the 1.3-litre and 1.6-litre Kent four-cylinder petrols, producing 53bhp and 64bhp respectively. These were followed by Ford’s 2.0-litre Essex V4 (with 93bhp) and the range-topping 138bhp 3.0-litre Essex V6, both of which made the Capri capable of speeds in excess of 100mph.

Ford entered the MkI Capri into the European Touring Car Championship in 1974, spawning its final, and fastest, iteration; the RS3100. ETCC homologation rules stated that 1,000 road-going RS3100s had to be built in order for the race car to be eligible, so Ford diligently set about the project.

Or, at least, so it claimed. In reality, Ford built no more than 250 examples of the Capri RS3100, as the 1973 oil crisis and waning consumer interest strangled sales. The road car was fitted with a de-tuned version of the race car’s 3.1-litre V6 engine, producing 148bhp and around 250Nm of torque. It featured vented disc brakes, lowered and stiffened suspension, a sports exhaust and a functional ducktail spoiler, meaning it was capable of sprinting from 0-60mph in 7.3 seconds and could reach a top speed of around 125mph.

Though under-appreciated in its day, the Capri RS3100 is now regarded as the best-performing and best handling version of the first-generation Capri and can easily command prices north of £40,000 on today’s classic car market.

Second generation Ford Capri (1974 – 1978)

In response to the 1973 oil crisis, Ford decided to modify the Capri’s design for the 1974 model year, making it into a car more suitable for everyday use. Revisions included a shortened nose, a more spacious cabin, a more practical clamshell rear hatch and a foldable rear bench seat, all of which made the Capri easier to manoeuvre and easier to live with.

Ford also made the Capri easier to drive by softening its suspension, adding larger disc brakes for the front and providing buyers with the option of an automatic gearbox and power-assisted steering for the higher-specced models. To remedy its charging issues, Ford gave the MkII Capri a standard-fit alternator in place of the MkI’s dynamo and, to maintain its sporty look, “S” models and above got a new air-dam.

As part of the revisions, the second-generation Capri received a simplified engine range. The 3.1-litre V6 from the RS3100 was discontinued and the 2.0-litre Essex V4 was replaced by the more conventional 2.0-litre straight-four Pinto engine, with an improved output of 98bhp. The base model 1.3-litre and 1.6-litre Kent four-cylinders remained, and the 3.0-litre Essex V6 reclaimed its position as the range-topper.

However, the main change for the second-generation Capri was the way it was marketed. Ford introduced a range of trim-levels and specifications which appealed to a wider range of buyers, providing everything from a poverty-spec 1300L model (which included little more than an engine, four seats and a steering wheel), right up to the range-topping Ghia and “Midnight Capri” models, which featured unique paint finishes, alloy wheels and sports steering wheels.

Third generation Ford Capri (1978 – 1986)

Known affectionately as Project Carla, the MkIII Capri began its design phase in 1976. Due to the project’s tight budget, it ended up being little more than a facelifted version of the MkII, with updates being limited to a set of redesigned quad-headlights, a pair of new wings, a new bonnet, fresh bumpers and updated paint and interior options.

In all, Ford spent around £480,000 on the development of the third-generation Capri, which is small change in comparison to the £20 million worth of development allocated for the first-generation model. To make up for the limited budget, Ford masked the Capri’s age through well-considered, cash-conscious trickery, repainting the MkII’s chrome bumpers and exterior trim in a more contemporary satin black and using existing tooling to create the MkIII’s trademark “hooded” bonnet.

Also in the interest of saving money, the MkII Capri’s engine range was carried over to the MkIII wholesale, helped along with a few minor improvements. For example, Ford updated its ageing 1.3-litre Kent engine with a new crossflow cylinder-head (replacing the previous model’s outdated reverse-flow head) and reshaped cylinder bores, which greatly improved reliability. The 3.0-litre Essex V6 also received a redesigned intake to prevent carburettor icing.

In 1981, increasingly stringent emissions regulations ousted the 3.0-litre Essex V6, which Ford replaced with a 2.8-litre fuel-injected V6 borrowed from the Granada. The reception to the new engine was good. Contemporary motoring journalists noted that, even though the Capri was priced to compete with the BMW 323i or Alfa Romeo Alfetta 2000 GTV of the day, its engine was larger, it was cheaper to maintain, it offered a more refined drive and it was faster.

The Capri remained on sale until 1986, with its sales gradually declining each year as drivers grew more strongly enticed by smaller, faster and more practical hot hatchbacks. In 2010, Ford flirted with the idea of reviving the Capri nameplate with a new Focus-based three-door hatchback coupe, designed to rival the Volkswagen Scirocco, but its plans didn’t progress past the initial stage of design. The Ford Capri remains an iconic name even today, loved by enthusiasts and well worth its place in history for the way it made sports coupe style and performance accessible to mainstream car buyers. Ford is unlikely to hear calls for a new Ford Capri reprising the original formula fall silent anytime soon.

Have you ever owned a Ford Capri? Tell us about your experience in the comments section below…



from Featured Articles http://bit.ly/2HLv1GY

Volkswagen Polo vs Volkswagen Golf

http://bit.ly/2S17wyB

2019-02-02 11:00

Our first intra-brand twin test pits the VW Polo supermini against the VW Golf family hatch

vw polo vs vw golf header

Car makers’ model ranges are growing at an incredible rate, with more and more niches being filled and vehicles evolving to the point where there is plenty of crossover between products in the line-ups.

So where once only a family hatchback would do, some buyers could now get away with a larger, more modern supermini – and that’s exactly the theory we’re putting under the spotlight with this brace of hatches.

Best hatchbacks on sale

If you’re embarking on a new car purchase, have a rough budget in mind, but you’re still not quite sure where your cash should go, then you’re in luck – especially if you’re buying monthly on PCP finance. We’re kicking off a new series analysing the merits of two models within a single brand’s line-up. Here, for our first intra-brand twin test, we’ve lined up the Volkswagen Polo and Golf.

Both are brilliant cars, but we’ll look at the strengths and (relative) weaknesses of each model and tell you which hatchback will suit you better depending on your needs.

Head-to-head

Model: Volkswagen Polo 1.0 TSI 115 DSG R-Line Volkswagen Golf 1.5 TSI Evo 130 DSG Match 5dr
Price:  £20,795 £23,655
Engine:  1.0-litre 3cyl turbo petrol 1.5-litre 4cyl turbo petrol
Power/torque:  113bhp/200Nm 128bhp/200Nm
Transmission:  Seven-speed dual-clutch automatic, front-wheel drive  Seven-speed dual-clutch automatic, front-wheel drive automatic, front-wheel drive 
0-60mph: 9.6 seconds 8.8 seconds
Top speed: 124mph 130mph
Test economy:  38.6mpg/8.5mpl 41.9mpg/9.2mpl
CO2/tax:  110g/km/£140 111g/km/£140
Options:  Metallic paint (£570), LED headlights (£850), adaptive cruise control (£600), keyless entry (£310), climate control (£415), Discover Navigation (£650), Active Info Display (£325), blind spot detection (£255), winter pack (£285) None

Volkswagen Polo

[gallery:1]

For: Increased practicality compared with predecessor, good availability of tech, more affordable than Golf.
Against: Can’t match the Golf for quality, doesn’t ride as well, not as happy on the motorway.

With its transformation into this larger and more mature sixth generation, the VW Polo came of age. That’s thanks to a transfer to a new platform, called MQB A0 – similar tech to that underpinning the Golf, but downscaled slightly. It means the Polo shares its engines with its bigger brother, and it’s the 113bhp 1.0-litre turbocharged three-cylinder we’re testing (a cheaper, manual-only 94bhp model is also available).

The TSI is a good performer. Smooth, torquey and refined, it propelled the Polo from 0-60mph in 9.6 seconds. While this was 0.8 seconds down on the Golf, these models aren’t defined by their performance; as long as there’s enough speed and an adequate level of grunt to get you out of trouble if needed, it’s sufficient. And while the Polo isn’t breathtaking, it’s easily adequate at full throttle.

[gallery:3]

Where you do notice the difference to the Golf is in gear. Both models use a seven-speed dual-clutch automatic transmission that shifts with the same nicely slurred action and with a sharper snap in manual mode. But both exhibit the same jerky automatic clutch take-up when manoeuvring.

Despite producing the same 200Nm of torque as the Golf, the Polo trailed its bigger brother between 30 and 50mph in third and fourth gears, yet the lighter supermini made this advantage stick in the higher gears between 50 and 70mph. However, the differences are only a few tenths in most cases and not dramatic enough to be an issue. Both offer good mid-speed flexibility, which will be felt when accelerating out of towns and villages and while going for overtakes on motorways.

On motorways the Polo isn’t as content as the Golf, though. While it’s a consummate cruiser, this has to be qualified with the caveat ‘for a supermini’. Part of its new-found maturity stems from this refinement, but it’s still not as subdued as the Golf.

[gallery:5]

There’s more wind and road noise, plus the ride isn’t as settled as its bigger brother’s at high speed – although it is just as agile as the Golf, with lifeless but accurate steering that doesn’t kick back.

The Polo in R-Line trim offers autonomous braking, and an eight-inch colour touchscreen with Bluetooth and DAB, CarPlay and Android Auto, giving you sat-nav capability; built-in nav is a £650 option. R-Line styling and 16-inch alloys complete the kit list; interior equipment nearly matches the Golf’s, but quality just isn’t quite as good. There are more hard surfaces in the Polo, and while it feels as well built (this is a VW trait across the board rather than model specific), the Golf’s materials are plusher.

Testers' notes

  • • Infotainment: Polo’s touchscreen system is inspired by Golf’s. That means good connectivity, with Apple CarPlay and Android Auto.
  • • Transmission: DSG automatic is adequate, but the manual gearbox in both cars is smoother and cheaper.
  • • Materials: Cheaper price tag means economies have to be made, so the Polo’s cabin doesn’t have the same premium feel of its big brother. Tech is still good.

Volkswagen Golf

[gallery:2]

For: Comfort, technology, refinement and classless image.
Against: Cheaper Polo is nearly as practical, DSG gearbox not as nice as manual option and costs more (but this is the same with the Polo).

The Volkswagen Golf was the car that kicked off the German firm’s modular model line-up revolution. It’s based on the MQB platform matrix that can take elements, including chassis, engines, safety technology and connectivity, from anywhere within the ‘tool kit’ the brand has developed.

This full MQB architecture means it can be scaled up to a size larger than the Polo’s MQB A0 underpinnings can manage, but the construction and philosophy are very similar for the two five-door hatchbacks we’re testing here.

The Golf is a larger model so to obtain similar performance to the Polo, this 1.5 TSI Evo engine with 128bhp is necessary. Linked to a seven-speed DSG dual-clutch auto box like in the supermini, it sprinted from 0-60mph in 8.8 seconds on test. This was nearly a second up on the Polo, while it held this advantage through the gears from 30 to 70mph.

[gallery:6]

Performance is adequate, then, but these cars will more often be driven with economy rather than speed in mind. Here the Golf has some clever tech. The 1.5-litre turbo four-cylinder petrol engine offers cylinder deactivation, so can shut down two of its four combustion chambers on light throttle loads to help increase economy. A coasting function where the DSG box disengages and the engine actually turns off when you lift off also helps cut fuel use.

This mostly happens at higher speeds on the motorway, where the Golf is at home, because the larger hatchback doesn’t have the same subtle harsh edge to the ride. The rear axle still feels limited in its ability to damp aggressive bumps at speed, but otherwise, on a gnarly country road at regular pace the Golf smothers enough so as not to upset the air of relative calm and serenity.

It’s not the sharpest choice for drivers, but the steering has a nice weight, doesn’t feel resistant and is pointy so you can place the car with confidence.

[gallery:4]

This quality is married to a cabin that’s still the best in its class even after nearly seven years since the Mk7 Golf launched, although there’s been a facelift to keep it fresh in the intervening period. But it still edges the Polo for finish and feel (there are fewer hard materials and they’re better hidden in the Golf, too), which comes down to the price.

In Match trim you get a standard spec that just exceeds the Polo R-Line, including an eight-inch screen with nav, CarPlay and Android Auto, autonomous braking with pedestrian detection, front and rear parking sensors, plus 16-inch alloys. The Golf also has adaptive cruise (it’s a £600 option on the Polo). But while the core kit is similar, the Golf’s cabin offers a higher-quality feel.

Testers' notes

  • Infotainment: Golf’s system is easy to use and packed with features. Sat-nav is standard and you can also connect your phone via CarPlay or Android Auto.
  • • Transmission: We find the DSG automatic gearbox can be clunky pulling away. We prefer the smooth manual transmission.
  • • Materials: High-quality plastics and fabrics are used throughout the cabin. Interior feels well put together as well.

Verdict

Volkswagen Golf

[gallery:20]

If we’d tested a 1.0 TSI Golf the Polo might have won, but with this 1.5 TSI 130, the larger Golf offers a lot more for just a little extra outlay on PCP. It’s faster, comfier, better kitted out, gets more tech and has a higher-quality feel. It’s only slightly more practical, but this is enough to sway the decision.

Volkswagen Polo

[gallery:7]

The Polo’s operating window is broader than ever, to the point where in some situations it offers what the Golf does. But in these specs with these engines the slower, thirstier, less well equipped and less practical supermini loses out. It’s worth spending the extra on the family car’s PCP.



from Featured Articles http://bit.ly/2sYp27C

Friday, February 1, 2019

Hyundai Santa Fe review

http://bit.ly/2UEFuWD

For 
Lots of space
Very comfortable
Good standard equipment
Our Rating 
4
Against 
Expensive top-spec models
Potential for poor residuals
Average fuel economy
Hyundai Santa Fe - front
2019

The Hyundai Santa Fe is a practical, well-built family SUV with seven seats and loads of standard equipment

The Hyundai Santa Fe is a great alternative to rivals like the Skoda Kodiaq, Peugeot 5008Kia Sorento and Nissan X-Trail. It’s a talented family car that combines space, comfort, great levels of standard kit and a fairly decent drive. 

Even entry-level Santa Fe SE models come complete with standard features that some other manufacturers charge extra for, including adaptive cruise control and Apple Carplay/Android Auto connectivity. 

Sadly though, Premium SE models are considerably more expensive than an equivalent version of the Kodiaq – almost £6,300 more, in fact.

1 Feb, 2019
4

With a much bolder appearance than the previous generation Hyundai Santa Fe, the latest car has a look that’s inspired by the smaller Hyundai Kona, with a large hexagonal grille, slim headlights, plus new bumpers and redesigned tail lights. Wheels range from 17 to 19-inches and sit within obligatory pumped-up wheel arches. The overall look is one of a more upmarket offering than before, and one that compares favorably to handsome, fashion-forward rivals like the Peugeot 5008 and Skoda Kodiaq. 

The usual array of silvers, greys and blacks make up the bulk of the car’s colour palette, with Lava Orange, Stormy Sea blue and Horizon Red offering welcome splashes of colour. We’re particularly fond of Rain Forest – a greenish-blue metallic grey. Metallic paint is optional across the range; all models get chrome and dark chrome-coloured exterior trim, with Lava Orange and Phantom Black models boasting more dark chrome trim elements.

The makeover continues inside where the Santa Fe’s vast cabin gets a curvaceous dashboard, comfortable seating and up-to-date infotainment displayed on a 7.0- or 8.0-inch screen, depending on trim level. SE models come as standard with black and grey cloth upholstery, while higher-spec Premium and Premium SE models gain swathes of grey, black or burgundy leather, matched to faux leather trim on the dashboard and door cards, offering a more luxurious feel. The Peugeot 5008 feels a little more exciting inside in terms of design, but the Hyundai is a match for the Skoda Kodiaq in terms of overall quality.

Entry-level SE models get the aforementioned cloth upholstery as standard, adding a leather steering wheel and gearknob, adjustable seats with lumbar support, dual-zone climate control and an automatically dimming rear-view mirror. 17-inch wheels are standard, too.

Premium models get 18-inch alloys, but most changes are on the inside. Leather upholstery is added along with its matching faux leather dash trim, while there’s cloth trim on the A-, B- and C-pillars. Both front seats gain heating and full electric adjustment including height and lumbar, while the outer middle-row seats are also heated.  

SE Premium tops the range. 19-inch alloys are the biggest change on the outside here, while memory and ventilation functions are added to the front seats inside. Manual rear door blinds are fitted, as is a panoramic glass sunroof with electric tilt and slide functionality.

Sat-nav, stereo and infotainment

The Hyundai Santa Fe comes as standard with one of two infotainment systems. SE models feature a 7.0-inch centrally mounted touchscreen display for the car’s audio and connectivity options, while Premium and SE Premium models get a fully fledged 8.0-inch system with sat-nav and online connectivity services. Annual map updates for the car’s sat-nav (if fitted) are provided for at least 10 years.

As in other Hyundai models, the system is clear and simple to use, offering easy control over audio, connectivity, navigation and vehicle set-up. Bluetooth connectivity with voice recognition is standard, as are Apple CarPlay and Android Auto – effectively negating the need for a step up to a model with sat nav for Google Maps users. The touchscreen system is used to control most functions, but steering wheel buttons can be used to operate phone and audio systems. 

SE models come with standard analogue dials, but further up the range a digital display is added, flanked by analogue auxiliary readouts. This display lacks the flair of Peugeot’s all-digital i-Cockpit system and it’s not quite as clear and sensible as the Kodiaq’s Virtual Cockpit. Overall, Hyundai’s effort sits somewhere between the two, which isn’t a bad place to be.

Standard SE models come with an unbranded sound system with six speakers, but Premium and SE Premium Santa Fes are fitted with a 10-speaker system developed by American hi-fi brand KRELL. It features a subwoofer and external amplifier for deeper bass and improved sound quality.

3.8

The Hyundai Santa Fe is available with one engine – a turbocharged 2.2-litre four-cylinder diesel with 197bhp and 440Nm of torque. SE models are two-wheel drive only, with a choice of a six-speed manual or eight-speed automatic. Premium models get the option of four-wheel drive with both gearboxes, while Premium SE models have the same choice of two or four driven wheels but are offered with the automatic only. 

Even on rough British B-roads, the Santa Fe impresses with a great sense of composure. The car’s body is very well controlled, remaining flat and unruffled by surface imperfections; body roll in corners is well-contained and – on our car’s 19-inch alloys – grip levels are high for a car of this type. The standard self-levelling suspension is well-damped and makes all journeys a relaxing experience.

Best 4x4s and SUVs on sale

A drive mode selector helps set up the Santa Fe for most road conditions, moving torque around the car’s HTRAC four-wheel drive system to find the most grip or save fuel. In Eco mode the Santa Fe reverts to two-wheel drive, while Sport mode splits torque 50/50 across the front and rear to maximise grip and traction. Comfort softens the car’s responses, while Smart enables an automatic switch between modes depending on the driver’s inputs.

A small gripe is the Santa Fe’s steering, which remains heavy regardless of the selected drive mode and is pretty devoid of feedback.

Engines, 0-60 acceleration and top speed

We tested a top-spec Hyundai Santa Fe Premium SE with four-wheel drive and an auto ‘box. The 2.2-litre diesel is refined on the move but with plenty of low-down power when needed, while the automatic gearbox is smooth and quick in its operation and perfectly calibrated to suit the big SUV’s comfortable character. Performance is not scintillating, but perfectly adequate for most daily situations.

What you get in terms of performance is fairly typical for a large SUV – two-wheel drive, manual gearbox versions manage 0-62mph in 9.4 seconds, with automatics dropping to 9.3 seconds. Four-wheel drive Santa Fe models manage 9.5 seconds and 9.4 seconds with manual and automatic gearboxes respectively. Top speed is 127mph across the board.  

Buyers looking for outright performance from their diesel-powered seven-seat SUV will be better served by the Skoda Kodiaq. The 187bhp diesel version with a DSG automatic gearbox is a keen performer, but for a similar price to our top-spec Santa Fe test car with some options added, a Kodiaq vRS with 237bhp, 500Nm of torque and a 0-62mph time of just seven seconds could be just the ticket for those looking for a little extra performance.

4.5

The Hyundai Santa Fe was awarded a five-star safety rating from Euro NCAP, scoring an impressive 94% in the adult occupant category and 88% for child occupant safety. The Santa Fe joins the Kona, Tuscon and Ioniq Hybrid in Hyundai’s five-star club. Rivals from Skoda, Peugeot and Nissan are all five-star cars too.

Part of the reason for the Santa Fe’s great rating was its selection of standard active safety equipment. Autonomous emergency braking (AEB) is standard across the range and has pedestrian detection capabilities, while hill start and descent control systems are also standard, along with lane departure warning with lane-keep assist. 

Premium models add rear-cross traffic alert and a blind-spot detection system that can actively intervene by applying the car’s brakes on either side to try to avoid a side-swipe accident. SE Premium models add similar technology to the rear-cross traffic system for an extra safety net when reversing. 

It's too soon to tell how reliable the latest Santa Fe will be, but given its excellent build quality and Hyundai’s good reputation for reliability, we have few worries in this department. Hyundai finished 15th out of 26 brands in our Driver Power 2018 survey, ahead of Ford, Peugeot, Audi, Mercedes and BMW, to name a few.

Warranty 

All Hyundai models come with an unlimited mileage, five-year warranty that’s amongst the very best in class – especially if you plan to keep your Santa Fe for more than the average two or three years or so. Neither the Skoda Kodiaq nor the Peugeot 5008 can match this, with the former supplied with a standard three-year/60,000-mile policy and the latter a two-year, unlimited mileage warranty.

The Santa Fe also comes with one year of free 24-hour roadside assistance anywhere in the UK or Channel Islands, plus five free annual vehicle health checks. 

Servicing

Hyundai’s usual servicing pricing applies to the Hyundai Santa Fe, albeit with a £20 surcharged as applied to the larger vehicles in its range. A base service costs from £119, an interim service starts at £189 and a full service costs from £249. Optional MoTs at each service add £40 if required. 

Hyundai has a range of servicing payment options; a handy online quotation system can help make budgeting to run the Santa Fe easier.

4.5

All Hyundai Santa Fe models come as standard with seven seats, much like its Peugeot 5008 and Skoda Kodiaq rivals – though the Nissan X-Trail can be had with a choice of five or seven. In this company, the Hyundai’s rearmost bench seems a little tight and is best suited to children.  By contrast, the Santa Fe’s front and middle-row seats are very roomy. 

The driving position is excellent, especially in models further up the range with the fullest range of electric adjustment – it’s very easy to get comfortable behind the wheel. Visibility is similarly good for a car of this type; there’s a larger glasshouse than in the Peugeot 5008 and low-speed maneuvering is made easier by the standard rear camera, or simpler still by the SE Premium’s 360-degree camera system. 

The Santa Fe is a practical proposition, not least thanks to its wealth of clever interior features. The glovebox is large, the cabin is strewn with useful cubby holes and in the rear there are two USB slots and a 12V power outlet for charging all manner of devices. Front and rear armrests are standard; the former boasts a storage compartment, while the latter has two cupholders. The front cupholders are well located and of a decent size – much better than those of the Peugeot 5008, which get in the way - especially in combination with a manual transmission. 

Size

The Hyundai Santa Fe is almost exactly the same size as its two closest rivals, the Skoda Kodiaq and Peugeot 5008. All three measure 4.7 metres in length, give or take a couple of centimetres; the Hyundai is the widest at 1.89 metres, while the Peugeot is the narrowest at 1.84m. The Santa Fe stands slightly higher than the Skoda (1.68 metres) and the Peugeot (1.68 metres) at a shade over 1.7 metres. Despite its size, the Hyundai is still relatively easy to maneuver in a tight spot.

The Hyundai’s roofline gives enough space for luggage and third-row passengers, but the boxier Peugeot is probably slightly more practical in this regard. However, most family buyers will not be disappointed by the Santa Fe’s practicality, especially if the rearmost seats are only used for children or for adults over shorter distances.  

Leg room, head room & passenger space 

There’s not much to complain about in the first two rows of seating – there’s ample space and adjustment in the front for even tall occupants to get comfortable, while the middle row can easily fit three adults abreast – a feat that’s made easier by a flat floor. The Santa Fe has a wheelbase that’s 65mm longer than in the old model and this equates to more kneeroom than before; headroom is ample too.

The Skoda Kodiaq offers more space to its rearmost passengers, but the Hyundai’s 3rd row seats don’t feel as tight as those in the rear of the Peugeot 5008. It’s pretty even in the middle row stakes, and unlike the Peugeot 5008, our top-spec model’s panoramic sunroof wasn’t intrusive for those over six feet tall. 

Easily accessible ISOFIX points are provided in the front passenger seat and in the outer middle row seats only; by contrast, the Peugeot 5008 was one of the first SUVs to offer ISOFIX on all three of its middle row seats. The Skoda Kodiaq has two in the middle row, with a front-seat mount offered as an optional extra. 

Boot 

As with most cars in its class, the Santa Fe’s rearmost seats can be split-folded to lay flat and offer a large boot when not carrying seven passengers – 625 litres in this case. The third row seats are easily folded thanks to a pull-tag mechanism.

The middle row of seats split 60:40 and can be folded forward to give a total of 1,625 litres. The resultant space is a practical shape, with a wide, lipless opening to make loading heavier items easier. There’s also a luggage net and number of hooks to help keep things in place on the move. 

The boot space on offer trails the boxy Peugeot 5008’s 780-litre boot when its rear row is folded; the Skoda Kodiaq offers 720 litres with the rear row folded and a colossal 2,005 litres with all five rears folded flat. The Skoda’s boot floor is also flatter and squarer than that of the Hyundai when both rows are folded.

Towing

The Hyundai Santa Fe has decent towing credentials, with standard trailer stability assistance and a trailer wiring package. The maximum braked trailer tow weight is 2,500kg in cars with a manual transmission, regardless of the number of driven wheels. Automatic models are limited to a maximum braked tow weight of 2,000kg. If you need an automatic tow car and have more than 2,000kg to tow, a Skoda Kodiaq with a diesel engine and DSG gearbox matches the manual Santa Fe’s 2,500kg braked limit.

3.5

The Hyundai Santa Fe’s single 2.2-litre diesel engine is a good performer but has a lot of weight to move around and that impacts economy. Fuel economy is quoted under the latest, more accurate WLTP regulations as 42.8mpg for the manual, two-wheel drive models and 42.2mpg for the automatic two-wheel drive versions, each figure is for SE trim with the smallest 17-inch wheels.

Premium models return 43.5mpg and 42.8mpg in two-wheel drive form with manual and automatic gearboxes respectively; add in four-wheel drive and those figures drop to 40.4mpg and 39.8mpg in each case. 

Top-spec models are the least economical thanks to the addition of the largest available 19-inch wheels: 42.8mpg for the two-wheel drive auto and 38.7mpg for the four-wheel drive auto. 

CO2 emissions range from 150g/km in the most efficient Premium model with two-wheel drive and a manual ‘box to 164g/km in the Premium SE model with four-wheel drive and an automatic. All models fall within the 151-170g/km range for first-year road tax for RDE2-compliant diesels, meaning a charge of £515 that’ll be rolled into the on-the-road price. After this, you’ll pay £140 per year, plus a £310 surcharge if your chosen model costs over £40,000 including options. 

The Santa Fe’s start-stop system is only standard on Premium models and above.

Insurance groups

Insurance costs could be slightly higher than those of the Santa Fe’s closest rivals; SE models sit in group 36, Premium models in groups 39/40 and Premium SE models in group 40. By contrast, the Skoda Kodiaq starts in insurance group 12 and climbs to around group 24 for the most expensive, non-vRS versions.

Depreciation 

Depreciation has the potential to be a bit of a sticking point for those choosing the Santa Fe over its rivals, especially in the case of the most expensive models. After 36 months of ownership, a top-spec four-wheel-drive Premium SE model with an automatic ‘box is predicted to lose just over 46% of its value when it comes to trade-in time – that’s the equivalent of just over £20,000. 

However, it’s worth noting that top-spec Kodiaq models are only predicted to hang on to around 45-48% of their list price after the same period. Values for the Peugeot 5008 sit at around 41-46%



from Featured Articles http://bit.ly/2S3bLtz

Mitsubishi Mirage updated for 2019 with lower base price

http://bit.ly/2BdVkjC

Luke Wilkinson 2019-02-01 15:25

The entry-level Mitsubishi Mirage is now £1,000 cheaper than before, while a more efficient 1.2-litre engine is now available

Mitsubishi Mirage - front

The Mitsubishi Mirage range has been updated for the 2019, adding a more efficient engine and reducing the cost of the entry-level model by £1,000. Prices for the supermini now start from £11,295.

Best superminis on sale

Mitsubishi’s 1.2-litre three-cylinder engine has been re-engineered to meet the recently-introduced real-world driving regulations, returning claimed CO2 emissions of 107g/km and economy of 60.1mpg. Power figures remain unchanged at 79bhp and 106Nm of torque.

The base model Mirage 3 remains relatively well-equipped, coming fitted with 14-inch alloy wheels, LED tail lights, a boot spoiler, automatic windscreen wipers, air conditioning, a bluetooth stereo, keyless entry and go, a leather steering wheel and stop-start. 

Mitsubishi’s new Mirage 4 acts as the range-topper. Priced from £13,355 with a manual gearbox, or £14,020 with an automatic, it adds 15-inch alloy wheels, Bi-Xenon headlamps, a touch screen infotainment system, a DAB radio, support for Apple CarPlay and Android Auto, heated front seats and rear parking sensors.

Now read our review of the Mitsubishi Mirage. Let us know your thoughts in the comments section below…

 



from Featured Articles http://bit.ly/2Bhj3PR