Monday, December 23, 2019

Red route restrictions rise as councils try to ease congestion

https://ift.tt/34PwLW3

Tristan Shale-Hester 2019-12-24 00:01

Growing number of red route parking restrictions have led to a 14-fold increase in penalties

Red route restrictions

A growing number of UK councils have introduced red-route parking restrictions, leading to a 14-fold increase in penalty charges over the last five years, Auto Express can exclusively reveal.

Double red lines and other red route restrictions, such as single red lines and signposted red routes, were introduced in London in 1991 to prevent drivers parking on busy thoroughfares. Since then, 360 miles of red route have sprung up in the capital, with drivers fined £110 for parking on the routes, and Transport for London generating revenue of £32.8million in the 2016/17 financial year from fines.

Best parking apps for your phone

Other local authorities are now following suit, with 15 councils outside London confirming they have either introduced red routes, or are planning to do so. Nine councils already have schemes in place, with six authorities confirming they are planned.

The nine local authorities outside the Capital operating red routes are: Aberdeen, Blackburn, Castle Donington, Coventry, Leeds, Nottingham, Reading, Sheffield and Solihull. Combined, those authorities have issued 19,287 penalties worth £1,350,090 over the last five years. The growth of red route schemes means the number of penalties has increased from just 766 in 2015, to 10,499 in the first 10 months of 2019.

Solihull, West Midlands, was one of the first places outside London to introduce the restrictions, and the town now has 19 miles of red routes, generating fines worth about £73,290 in 2019. The six councils with plans to introduce red routes are Knowsley, Trafford, Thurrock, Brighton, Leicester and Newcastle.

A spokesperson for the Local Government Association (LGA) called red routes a “vital safety measure for roads where it is essential to make sure traffic is kept moving, and to reduce congestion”. The LGA also stressed that income from red-route penalties is spent on parking services, with surplus revenue going to local transport projects such as pothole filling and concessionary bus fares.

Nicholas Lyes, head of roads policy at the RAC, said he felt red routes were “being introduced for the right reasons, which are guaranteeing access for the emergency services and ensuring traffic flow isn’t disrupted by parked vehicles, rather than as a new way of bringing in additional revenue for cash-strapped councils”.

Do you think red route parking restrictions are a good idea? Let us know your thoughts below...



from Featured Articles https://ift.tt/35RvMpP

Best long-term cars 2019: why our cars have been the stars

https://ift.tt/2Q9LUw6

Auto Express 2019-12-23 16:20

We had a huge variety of cars on our long-term fleet in 2019, but these were our highlights of the year

Best long-term cars 2019 - header

A huge variety of cars visit our office throughout the year, but only a select few get to spend some extra time on our long-term fleet. Every year members of the Auto Express team get behind the wheel of cars for an extended period of time, covering thousands of miles to truly see how they would cope with daily life.

In 2019 we had an eclectic mix of long termers, everything from camper vans to hot hatchbacks and electric cars to pick-up trucks, but what were the cars that we really enjoyed testing? We've picked out our highlights below, so scroll down to see which long termers will really be missed...

Best long-term cars 2019

BMW 3 Series

Sean Carson, Chief reviewer

Sean rediscovered a long-lost hobby this year: golf. Having not played for around 15 years he remembers what the club car park used to look like – full of executive saloons – before the SUV craze took over. On his return, he found things were a bit different, with off-roaders littering the club car parks he visited.

But this also brought a few points to the fore. Sean thought a junior exec saloon was still all you needed and that his 320d M Sport represented that perfectly; that’s thanks in part to how well the BMW fits in with another of Sean’s favourite pastimes: driving.

It is so good to drive. The ride is controlled, the steering nicely weighted and although there’s not lots of feedback, on his country-road route to the course he could easily sense the BMW’s balance through the seat. It’s also more refined than ever and laden with tech that’s easy and intuitive to use.

Having driven a pre-production 3 Series in the summer of 2018, attended the launch this time last year, and conducted our first group test back in January before taking delivery of his car in April, Sean followed this car’s journey from start to finish – and what a journey. Six months and 6,000 miles behind the wheel have proved it’s close to the best car on sale in the UK.

BMW 320d M Sport long-term test review

Volkswagen California

Richard Ingram, Reviews and features editor

We couldn’t let our time with the VW California pass without a proper European road trip, so as soon as the keys landed in the office, reviews and features editor Richard Ingram set about planning an epic drive around France.

Rich and his wife are seasoned campers, so the prospect of two weeks on the road didn’t faze them. Plus they could pack for every eventuality; the VW’s myriad cupboards and clever storage swallowed everything they could throw at it.

The pair’s route took them through Fontainebleau, Chablis, Uzes, Avignon and Gordes, before stopping in Annecy, Colmar and Champagne on the way home.

While the VW was far from five-star luxury, our man loved its flexibility, and being able to pull over for a steaming hot cuppa whenever they chose made their 2,000-mile journey a pleasure rather than a chore. Take him to one side and Rich will tell anyone that this is the best car he’s ever run.

Volkswagen California Ocean long-term test review

Renault Megane R.S. 

Jonathan Burn, News editor

As 2019 draws to a close, so does news editor Johnny Burn’s time with our lurid yellow Megane R.S. Look out for his final report on the car soon, because it’s due to leave the fleet early in 2020.

The current Megane R.S. comes from a long line of brilliantly engineered, addictive Renault hot hatches, but Johnny wondered if the Trophy was the pick of the current bunch. To find out, he compared our yellow model to this red Megane R.S. – a standard model.

Above our Trophy is the Trophy-R, the high-spec track-focused model with no rear seats. But after trying both of these other options, Johnny reckoned that the Trophy is the sweet spot: it brings a little more excitement than the basic model, but without the compromise of the Trophy-R. He also found that each one is fun in its own way, though.

Renault Megane R.S. 300 Trophy long-term test review

Volkswagen Polo 

Dawn Grant, Picture editor

Our favourite chocolate bars and sweets have been shrinking, but cars have been getting bigger – and Dawn said our Polo proved that point. If the famous mint with a hole had followed its namesake, it would be giant, because the car is so much bigger than it used to be.

During the Polo’s time on our fleet, Dawn found it really easy to live with. All the controls were light and simple to use, there was plenty of space for all her needs (even managing to carry four adults in comfort on a few trips) and the boot was easily big enough too. This is one of the reasons that cars like this have been getting bigger: it really improves their practicality.

Despite the larger size, the Polo was still perfect for a mainly urban lifestyle, because it’s not so big that it won’t fit in car parks and through width restrictors.

When it was taken for longer journeys it coped well on the motorway as well, which was proven by the many times colleagues grabbed the keys for trips around the country. Overall, it was a sweet car!

Volkswagen Polo SE L long-term test review

Kia e-Niro 

Vicky Parrot, Associate editor of DrivingElectric

The Kia e-Niro proved to sceptics – both within and outside Auto Express HQ – that electric cars are no longer a niche, oddball choice; and they’re not awkward to live with if you have a home charger. Quite the opposite.

Vicky Parrott’s e-Niro was a popular choice on the fleet given that it returned a real-world range of some 260 miles fairly routinely in the summer, even on motorway journeys. It was the cheapest option for anyone looking to save a bit of cash on a long run. But for all its penny-pinching merits, the Kia also stood out for how good it was from behind the wheel. Punchy performance, a smooth drive and great semi-autonomous mode made for fun and relaxing progress.

The ultimate win was to see the UK motorway charging network catching up with the incredible progress in electric vehicles. With electric cars as good as the e-Niro out there, and with new standards of public-charger speeds, reliability and payment methods starting to bolster the infrastructure, our time in the Kia really highlighted how the transition to electric power is something to embrace rather than fear.

Kia e-Niro long-term test review

Alfa Romeo Giulia 

James Batchelor, Head of motoring video

“O Romeo, Romeo, wherefore art thou, Romeo?” shouted our man Batch from the roof of Goodwood’s pit lane. James ran an Alfa Romeo Giulia Veloce in the first half of 2019, but the experience was similar to one of Shakespeare’s comedies.

The story began way back in May 2017, when our order for a Veloce was sent off to Italy. But come January the following year, it turned out the factory had lost the order, and by April we discovered the car had been built but lost. Finally, in July 2018, our car arrived and Batch spent a happy 12 months behind the wheel; the wait was totally worthwhile.

James loved the car’s revvy, responsive engine – he even claimed it was the nicest-sounding 2.0-litre four-cylinder engine in production – and the car’s beautiful styling (the £695 paint and £995 alloys helped). But most of all it was the agile chassis and super-sharp steering which really won him over.

There were a few niggles, however, including some poor interior build quality and the car having the wrong instrument binnacle fitted. But overall it was a fun and interesting experience.

Alfa Romeo Giulia Veloce long-term test review

Skoda Fabia

James Brodie, Senior staff writer

It was a tale of two superminis for senior staff writer James Brodie in 2019. While our man started the year by saying goodbye to his beloved bright orange MINI Cooper, he was soon driving a similarly colourful, bright blue Skoda Fabia SE L.

If Brodie fell for the MINI because of its form, the appeal of the Fabia lay more in its function. So what better way to bid farewell to the Skoda than by throwing a graduation ceremony for the ‘simply clever’ supermini?

The Fabia lacked a little flair, but the surroundings chosen for its send-off didn’t disappoint. The winding streets of Oxford, its world-renowned university and the stunning Bridge of Sighs provided a perfect location.

Ultimately, the Skoda passed our examination with distinction. During its six-month spell on our fleet, staff writer Luke Wilkinson found it handy for long journeys to Cumbria, while James found it a useful little car for getting around London, thanks to its refreshingly straightforward nature, good visibility and lightweight controls.

Skoda Fabia SE L long-term test review

Ford Focus 

Stuart Milne, Managing editor

It was a case of ‘meet the new boss, same as the old boss’ for Stuart Milne back in the summer. As a three-time Ford Focus owner, he was delighted to get to grips with Ford’s latest incarnation. Stuart has owned the car you see on the left for more than six years, and there’s little it can’t handle.

And over more than 4,000 miles, Stuart found the same is true of the latest model. The biggest change is that the latest Focus’ myriad talents are wrapped up in an altogether more premium package.

It’s a package you’ll have to dig deep for, with a £28,000 price tag as tested, but Stuart reckons it’s a price worth paying even in the face of competition from more upmarket brands.

The interior felt plush, the tech proved brilliant, and Stuart loved the optional B&O Play audio upgrade – but not has much as he enjoyed the way the Focus drives. Indeed, not even a blast in the brilliant ST could dull Stuart’s enthusiasm for his more workaday diesel model.

Ford Focus Titanium X long-term test review

SEAT Tarraco 

Pete Baiden, Web producer

Although the SEAT Tarraco has seven seats, Pete spent most of his time with the rear bench folded down so he could take advantage of the huge boot. And he certainly made the most of it by constantly loading it up, usually taking new furniture home from IKEA or ferrying unwanted items to the local tip.

In fact, he spent so much time loading heavy stuff in and out of the Tarraco that it often felt like he’d been to the gym. Still, Pete says the Tarraco was almost flawless in every aspect of daily family life. And not just for its practicality.

He said the handling was really impressive for such a large SUV and the 2.0-litre diesel engine provided the perfect blend of performance and efficiency.

SEAT Tarraco SE Technology long-term test review

Kia Ceed

Alex Ingram, Staff writer

Alex’s Kia Ceed took a while to totally reveal its charms, but he was fully hooked by the time he waved goodbye to it. For a start, he believed it to be one of the most handsome five-door hatches on the market today.

Meanwhile inside, the seats stood out for Alex. Seat comfort is a subjective thing that completely depends on your body size and shape. Nevertheless, everyone who tried the Ceed loved the style and support they offered. The steering wheel was lovely, too.

It was really quite fun to drive too, which made it even more of a shame that the dual-clutch gearbox was such a let-down. This stopped it being a perfect everyday car.

Kia Ceed GT-Line S long-term test review

Jaguar XE

Steve Sutcliffe, Special contributor

It’s quite a journey from Steve’s place in Hove up to Anglesey circuit in north Wales. You can take motorways pretty much the whole way, or you can go cross country – easily more fun in the right car.

Steve did the trip three times in the Jaguar XE, and each time he went cross-country, simply because the journey brought out the car’s good sides. Not just its lovely steering feel and superb ride and handling but also its brilliant matrix LED lights, its fine seats, strong engine and general ease of use.

If you think Steve really liked the XE, you’d be totally right. In fact, he even reckoned he’d have one over the equivalent BMW 3 Series, which is saying something.

Jaguar XE P300 long-term test review

Hyundai Santa Fe 

Steve Walker, Group web editor

Whatever you think of SUVs, you can’t deny that they play the family car role as expertly as Robert De Niro does sinister Mafia bosses. Steve Walker had our Santa Fe from spring to autumn and it delighted on a couple of levels.

First, for delivering the family from A to B smoothly and efficiently, the Santa Fe was a star. Its size helped, but so did the sensible, unfussy layout, and lots of USB charging points!

Second, the Santa Fe majored on quality and value. It was solidly built, high quality and designed with a flourish that lots of the European alternatives could learn from.

The whole package came together on an August family holiday to the south west, where the big blue Hyundai excelled. It really is a family SUV to be reckoned with.

Hyundai Santa Fe Premium SE long-term test review

Audi A6

Pete Gibson, Senior staff photographer

At the start of 2019, Pete ran an Audi A6 Avant, and after six months behind the wheel, he decided that it was unmatched as transport for an Auto Express photographer.

In his role he spends many long hours on the motorway, and the A6 had this covered easily. Its comfortable ride and incredible infotainment set-up meant he was always relaxed and ready to shoot whenever he arrived, and it was no issue getting his favourite radio station switched on and set to the loudest possible volume for the duration of the trip.

There were never any complaints from his kids, because there was endless rear legroom and enough USB ports to keep them happy. Indeed, the interior space was a big part of why the A6 Avant was so perfect for Pete, who has to cart around lights, tripods, stands, battery storage and cameras – plus the odd stepladder on occasion.

The icing on the cake was the 2.0-litre diesel engine, which averaged more than 50mpg in the six months he drove it for.

Audi A6 Avant 40 TDI long-term test review

Honda CR-V Hybrid

Darren Wilson, Group art director

If you can’t trust your family’s opinion, then whose can you trust? That was what art director Darren Wilson thought when he enlisted his mum Tina and stepfather Peter to assess his Honda CR-V Hybrid.

Peter has owned four CR-Vs, plus a Honda-engined Rover and a Honda Accord over the years, so it’s fair to say he knows a thing or two about Honda’s product line. When asked why he’s so loyal to the brand, Peter singles out the reliability of its engines, saying: “All these years I’ve been driving and they’ve never let me down.”

The hybrid turned out to be a winner too, with Peter loving the push-button auto gear set-up and near silence when pulling away.

Most importantly, the lack of boot lip on the current CR-V makes loading the golf clubs easier. Darren was delighted to have their opinions.

Honda CR-V Hybrid long-term test review

Jaguar I-Pace

Steve Fowler, Editor-in-chief

Editor-in-chief Steve Fowler went from one end of the SUV spectrum to the other this year, swapping from a 577bhp Mercedes-AMG G 63 to an all-electric Jaguar I-Pace.

It was the latter that provided one of the highlights of Steve’s year – for the attention it got when Steve took part in the Chalfont St Giles Village Show back in September.

When he was parked up in the showground, Steve was inundated with people wanting to take pictures – of the car, not him. There were plenty of attendees interested in electric cars and even a few who were either on the waiting list for an I-Pace, or seriously considering one.

Steve got more than 200 miles out of a full charge of the 93kWh battery, while the way the I-Pace rode and handled always put a smile on his face.

And in an even greater irony, the Jag matched the G63’s 0-62mph time of 4.5 seconds, while running costs, not to mention emissions, were much more in the I-Pace’s favour.

Jaguar I-Pace long-term test review

Mercedes X-Class

Kim Adams, Products editor

There’s nothing like a long road trip to reveal whether a car is the one for you, and for products editor Kim Adams it was on a 500-mile, week-long trip to the Isle of Man for the three-hillclimb Manx Classic that the Mercedes X-Class 350 d truly won him over.

When it comes to ride comfort, the X-Class sets new standards for pick-ups and it made the four-hour trek to Liverpool for the ferry crossing a breeze.

Even with his Mk1 Ford Escort on a trailer behind, plus tools, tyres and a week’s luggage for three, the 254bhp V6 diesel was not troubled. It easily coped with everything.

On the downside, how a vehicle costing £58,000 as tested can be sold without Apple CarPlay or Android Auto is a mystery, plus it had an unhealthy thirst for diesel and AdBlue.

Mercedes X 350 d long-term test review

Dacia Duster

Otis Clay, Staff photographer

“Another one drives a Duster,” was this year’s marketing slogan, which set Queen fan Otis up for a photo opportunity he couldn’t miss. In fact, there’s a lesser-known song by the band titled “I’m in love with my car”, which seemed to perfectly fit Otis and his feelings about the Duster.

Dacia’s SUV may be one of the cheapest new models you can buy, especially if you limit that just to off-roaders, but the Duster’s blend of abilities suited photographer Otis down to the ground (much like his Freddie Mercury costume).

Otis reported that his car rode very smoothly on British roads, which was great because he spends a lot of time behind the wheel. It was also able to swallow all of his photography kit with ease, including car-cleaning kit and more, so there were no issues with practicality. There was even room for a wedding’s worth of wine in crates.

The Dacia’s simplicity was its trump card. The tech it has is the stuff you need: sat-nav, DAB and Bluetooth, and barely anything more. It is all about cutting costs, making it one of the best-value cars around as a result.

Dacia Duster 4x2 Comfort long-term test review

Citroen Berlingo

Hugo Griffiths, Consumer editor

It may seem strange to choose a photoshoot as being the main highlight after months of custodianship, but Hugo found taking the Berlingo to the Groucho Club in central London best encapsulated his feelings towards the car.

Why? Well, because it was its ability to charm the driver that shone through most, with its character and capabilities being far greater than its style quotient. And with the Groucho club being on a narrow street, having to quickly and repeatedly move the Berlingo during our shoot highlighted how manoeuvrable it is, and how good visibility is.

The Berlingo was in high demand among the Auto Express team. Some colleagues borrowed it to help friends move house, others for trips to the dump, or transporting bulky items like sofas. But whatever the journey, those who used it raved about its charm.

Citroen Berlingo XL Flair long-term test review

Hyundai Kona Electric 

John McIlroy, Deputy editor

The Hyundai Kona was already our Affordable Electric Car of the Year when we added it to our long-term test fleet at the start of this year. So for the EV’s farewell feature, John McIlroy decided to canvas the views of real-world owners to see whether their experiences matched his own.

And so an Oxfordshire hotel car park was taken over by pure-electric small SUVs, as eight examples of the Kona gathered on a sunny March morning. What struck John during the meeting was how clued-up EV buyers are. Many had solar power, and lots of them knew every software version and update version number, not only of their cars’ systems but also on their home smart meters.

Plus John noticed how this bunch of buyers seemed less inclined to be swayed by brand or image. The vast majority of the Kona owners had never owned a Hyundai before, showing how this car’s blend of more than 250 miles of range and a price of around £35,000 has introduced a whole new demographic to the Korean manufacturer.

Hyundai Kona Electric Premium SE long-term test review

What cars would you like to see on our fleet in 2020? Let us know in the comments section below...

Review of the Year 2019

• Best car news stories of 2019
• Best car reviews of 2019
• Best car group tests of 2019
• Best long-term tests of 2019
• Best motoring features of 2019
• Best car videos of 2019
• Best motorsport stories of 2019
• Our highlights of 2019



from Featured Articles https://ift.tt/2PJiQNb

Sunday, December 22, 2019

Head-to-head: the best car group tests of 2019

https://ift.tt/2Q7Mjz6

Auto Express 2019-12-22 10:35

We performed plenty of group tests in 2019, covering everything from superminis to supercars, but these are our favourties

Best car group tests of 2019 - header

There were plenty of new cars unveiled in 2019, but how many of them actually jumped to the top of their respective sectors? It’s our job at Auto Express to test each new arrival against the best in class to see if there’s a new king or not.

Each month we conduct a number of group tests, covering everything from city cars to luxury cars and SUVs to supercars. It’s this process that makes our group tests so valuable, as we are then able to recommend the best in class for each category.

So if you’re looking for a new car, but just can’t decide what to pick, a quick glance at our group tests page should help you decide. But before you head off to check them out, why not scroll down and have a read through our favourite group tests of 2019…

January

Latest Audi Q3 keeps its rivals at bay

Audi stole a march on its premium rivals when it first launched its Q3 crossover, but by the new year many premium competitors had caught up, so there was a lot riding on the all-new Q3. In petrol turbo form it fended off the challenge from one of our favourite small SUVs, Volvo’s XC40, to take group-test victory. The Q3 diesel would feature later in the year, but with less success.

BMW 3 Series vs Mercedes, Jaguar

A new BMW 3 Series is always big news. Early January saw us pitch the G20 model head-to-head with two of its closest rivals – the updated Mercedes C-Class and the Jaguar XE. We put every area of these upmarket saloons under the microscope to give the definitive verdict.

Despite a general trend towards SUVs even in this sector, junior execs are still huge profit-making products for their makers and so have to deliver across the board. With more infotainment and driving-assistance tech than ever, there were more opportunities for this trio to succeed – but more hidden traps for them to negotiate, too. All have traditionally excelled when it comes to the ride, handling and refinement balance, plus our 2.0-litre diesel test models offered decent efficiency. The 3 Series took victory due to an unbeatable blend of attributes that the Jag and Mercedes just couldn’t quite match. Its revised turbodiesel proved there’s life in this fuel yet and gave great performance and refinement, the updated infotainment excelled, it rode and handled like a small, sporty saloon should, and the improved packaging meant it was even more practical. Extra driver tech made it a more intelligent, more connected machine as well.

It wasn’t all perfect for the seventh-generation 3 Series, though. Throughout this year the BMW design team has been a little wide of the mark with the new models it has released, and given that this is one of the more conservative cars to come out of Munich, the 3 Series’ design still wasn’t to all tastes. However, this is very subjective – in every measurable area, the BMW triumphed over or at the very least equalled its rivals to pull off a convincing victory.

We said: “The 3 Series is king of the compact exec class. It sets a new benchmark for handling, but balances this with comfort and refinement. It’ll also be cheaper to run, boasts more practicality, and an updated interior and infotainment cement its first-place finish. In almost every area it betters its rivals, with advanced tech keeping up with buyers’ demands.”

That last point was key, and even though the BMW would face tougher challenges throughout the year, a 320d that joined our test fleet in April showed the car has the staying power to succeed and keep the 3 Series flame alight. 

February

Merc A35 AMG vs hot-hatch rivals

The hot-hatch market is full of fine cars, so Mercedes’ new AMG A35 had a tough task when it took on the Honda Civic Type R and VW Golf R. The A35 proved accomplished, but it lacked flair and fun compared with the Honda, and proved pricier yet no better than the Volkswagen. Its straight-line performance was strong, though, while its interior was easily the classiest.

New Citroen C5 Aircross is good, but still can’t beat  Karoq

Citroen’s Aircross SUV tag was applied to an all-new model with the C5 Aircross, the brand’s full-size family SUV. It arrived with the funky, fresh styling that Citroen is known for and a soft suspension that aimed to deliver decent comfort.

However, the soft set-up meant the car was wallowy and crashy, so it didn’t drive with the composure, comfort or precision of the best cars in this class. Plus its 1.2-litre engine – peppy enough in the smaller C3 Aircross – proved a little flat in this larger, heavier car. The C5 did nail practicality, though. Its interior featured plenty of tech, and versatile seating meant that owners could prioritise passenger or boot space.

Our test showed that there was nothing drastically wrong with the C5 Aircross, but also that there was nothing stand-out about it that demanded attention either.

In a class where every last little area has to be heavily optimised for a car to succeed – as it is with the Skoda Karoq that took victory – the C5 Aircross fell a little short. 

March

All-new Corolla faces up to Golf, 308

As well as replacing the Auris in the range, Toyota introduced a new chassis, powertrain and infotainment for its Corolla family hatch. Hybrid power remained, but sophisticated suspension meant the Corolla rode and handled as well as the Golf, the best car in the class up to this point in the year, and put it ahead of the Peugeot 308.

However, it lost out on practicality due to the hybrid system spoiling boot space a little. Plus Toyota failed to improve enough in an area where it’s always been weak: infotainment. Without the latest smartphone-compatible tech, it lost ground to the VW.

April

Mercedes G 63 vs Bentayga

This pairing faced off against each other to vie for the crown of the flashiest 4x4 on sale. Both used turbocharged V8s, cost around £150,000 and packed performance, tech and style. The British Bentley emerged victorious over the German brute, but not by much, because the G 63’s character is so unique that it’s a rare moment of indulgence to drive it in today’s electrified world.

Evoque vs Volvo XC40

When the original Range Rover Evoque launched, it helped to secure Land Rover’s financial future, shifting more than 800,000 models. So with a grey cloud hovering over the brand in 2019 related to Brexit uncertainty, the second-generation car had big shoes to fill – but it slotted in beautifully, taking up the original car’s mantle as one of the best small premium SUVs on sale.

In popular D180 form it beat the Volvo XC40 in our first twin test. While the Evoque was a little pricier, Land Rover pushed finance deals from the start, and that’s where the Evoque made more sense against its Swedish counterpart. Add in greater practicality, excellent quality and superb tech, and the Evoque had the sector sewn up.

Items such as Land Rover’s ClearSight tech – which uses cameras to ‘fill’ blind spots – and a digital rear-view mirror proved superbly simple solutions and incredibly effective tech that nosed the Evoque ahead of its competition.

But it was the foundations laid by the new PTA platform, the more refined 2.0-litre diesel engine and the supple but controlled suspension that cemented victory. The Evoque has a level of ride quality befitting of the Range Rover badge but it’s still fun to drive for an SUV.

May

Porsche 911 and Audi R8 face-off

The launch of a new Porsche 911 is always a big deal. In the model’s 56-year history there have been only eight generations – and this 992-codenamed version proved to us that it’s the most technologically advanced yet.

An updated turbocharged engine still featured at the rear of a wider chassis that used more aluminium than ever before, while the interior came in for a massive overhaul.

The 992 arrived at the same time as the facelifted Audi R8, which still turns up its nose at turbocharging with its glorious 5.2-litre naturally aspirated V10, and faced the Porsche in our exclusive twin test. Here, both cars proved stunning to drive for different reasons, but it was the 911 that showed it was the more complete sports car. Despite a lower power output, it out-performed the R8, out-cornered it, rode better and offered more practicality – and the new technology it offered sealed the deal.

Yet the swollen size and new assistance systems that forced some mechanical and electronic changes over its predecessor meant the 911 felt more remote than ever. Make no mistake, it’s still the best sports car on sale, but with the base Carrera and manual models not launching until later, this was a hint at the 911’s future development path. 

e-Niro is a bright spark among small EVs

Electric cars were among the dominant themes of 2019, so we pulled together three small, affordable EVs to find out which was best. The Kia e-Niro took victory, beating its mechanically and electronically similar cousin, the Hyundai Kona Electric, by virtue of greater practicality and more range – the latter being key in any EV. In fact, the Kia is one of the best cars we’ve tested all year.

June

Audi e-tron vs Jaguar I-Pace

At the time, the I-Pace was still our Car of the Year – and it’d faced little opposition since taking the crown nearly 12 months prior to this test against the e-tron. Few new EVs had been launched, let alone with the Jaguar’s premium aspirations, power, performance and price.

All that changed when the Audi EV arrived, although the I-Pace showed just how far ahead of the curve Jag was with its first electric car. Stronger efficiency than the e-tron proved more practical from a driving and range point of view, even if the Brit EV wasn’t as roomy inside. It also rode slightly better than the Audi and blitzed its rival for both performance and handling. The brand showed it understands EVs, too, with the electric car-specific elements a little better calibrated than Audi’s.

The Jag’s cabin might not have been as techy or well built, but it wasn’t far behind. Thanks to its bespoke EV platform, the I-Pace showed established rivals have a little way to go when it comes to making class-leading EVs, and that models adapted from existing architectures still have a few issues. However, both cars proved so convincing with their genuinely usable battery range that they could act as your only car in the majority of situations.

This pairing also highlights that the infrastructure lags behind the tech. Many companies are doing great work to kickstart the electric revolution, with BP Chargemaster at the fore, yet other charge providers such as Ecotricity proved unreliable. There were no complaints about either the Audi or the Jaguar’s ability, though. Both did well in this fiercely contested twin test, but the I-Pace came across as the better EV, and that’s why it took top honours.

Mazda 3 vs Golf vs Focus shoot-out

The mainstream family car market is one of the most crowded, with tough competitors at every turn – and the new Mazda 3 had to face two of the strongest when it met the Ford Focus and VW Golf back in the summer. The Mazda 3 has always handled well, so the Focus represented the dynamic benchmark, while the Golf was the yardstick by which the Mazda’s practicality, tech, quality and affordability would be judged.

The Japanese car came out with its head held high. It steered, rode and handled with as much class as the Ford, while the interior quality surpassed the Golf’s, helped by much-improved infotainment. However, the Mazda 3 suffered a little in practicality and all-round usability, so still had to give best to the VW. Nevertheless, it had returned as a very accomplished car.

July

Toyota Supra vs TT and Cayman

Few sports cars have been as hotly anticipated as the all-new Toyota Supra, and we put it through the full Auto Express road test in July. A few issues surrounding the link with BMW aside, the car impressed immensely and easily outshone the Audi TT RS, but Porsche’s 718 Cayman S still proved too strong a package to overcome. However, the Supra scored a solid second on merit.

New Skoda Scala tests its mettle against Golf and Ceed rivals

Fresh from its win in our New Car Awards, the Skoda Scala took on two of the toughest challengers in the family car class, facing off against the venerable Volkswagen Golf and the latest Kia Ceed. But in 1.0 TSI petrol form, the Scala showed why it was an award-winner, with an unbeatable blend of practicality and technology at an affordable price.

Budget is key in this class, and Skoda once again proved that its value-focused offerings resonate with buyers. The Scala drove as well as the Golf, and although it didn’t quite stack up to the VW when it came to material quality, its price was low enough for it not to matter.

It also had the measure of the Kia for standard kit, with SE trim featuring all the toys a mid-spec family hatch really needs.

The Golf was toppled, the Scala reigned king. But with a new eighth-generation VW on the horizon and set to battle the Skoda in 2020, will we be writing the same this time next year?

August

Tesla Model 3 edges out 3 Series in executive saloon test

The Tesla Model 3, Auto Express Car of the Year, had yet another big test in August as it took on one of the best in the business – the BMW 3 Series in 320d form – to see whether an electric car could genuinely be a more viable alternative to one of the best premium diesel saloons around. The result went the Tesla’s way, but the verdict wasn’t quite that simple.

On balance the EV took it, but if you use your exec saloon to cover long distances regularly then the BMW is still the better bet. However, for most users most of the time, the Tesla proved that it’ll offer enough flexibility from its 55kWh battery, serving up a claimed 254-mile range, so some owners might only need to charge once a week. And even long journeys aren’t too much trouble if you can hunt down a Tesla Supercharger or a DC rapid charger – the Model 3 being the first Tesla to be fully compatible with the latter. With the charging infrastructure growing, it’s becoming less of an issue, if not a totally avoidable one.

Thanks to its instant torque and urgency off the line the Model 3’s performance outstripped what the BMW could offer, while its annual running costs also far undercut the 320d’s. This was a main driver in the Tesla’s victory, since this gulf was so big that it’s hard to ignore in a type of car that many buy for business use. For those looking at this pairing with a view on company car tax, the Model 3 won hands down – and that was with BiK tax charged at 16 per cent. It drops to zero from the next tax year, where electric vehicles such as the Model 3 will have an even bigger advantage over their combustion-engined counterparts.

Dynamically it didn’t quite ride or handle with the BMW’s balance, but Tesla’s engineers have really clued into how to use the electric motor to help the car carve through corners. And while the suspension wasn’t quite as absorbent, it delivered plenty of composure and comfort. Yet with strong infotainment (the BMW was a particularly tough test for the Tesla here) and an improved interior with a decent amount of space and a versatile boot, our Car of the Year showed why it won our votes back in July. 

Mercedes EQC vs Audi e-tron in electrifying battle of premium EVs

The Mercedes EQC sits on another combustion-engined car platform turned into an EV, and it took on the Audi e-tron, which conforms to a similar recipe. But, the Merc mustered stronger efficiency – critical to maximise range.

Add to that a smoother ride, and the Merc just edged the Audi, even if it isn’t quite as practical. Both showed they have beautifully built, high-quality interiors, too, and so deserve their premium status and justify their fairly lofty price tags. However, this test highlighted that with cars such as the Tesla Model 3 and updated Model S, the premium EV sector had already moved on yet another half step by the time the EQC arrived.

September 

Ford Focus ST hot hatch versus Hyundai i30 N and Honda Civic Type R

The last few years for Ford’s performance division have shown it hit a rich vein of form, with the likes of the GT supercar and Fiesta ST hot hatch – and it was no different when the Focus ST arrived earlier in the year.

It landed with plenty of tech, including adjustable driver modes that altered the adaptive dampers, the limited-slip diff, the throttle response and the engine note, not to mention optional extras such as launch control. However, it did this in a less overawing way than the i30 N it went up against. This hot hatch offers myriad settings, all tuneable independently as opposed to the Ford’s choice of four pre-set modes.

The ST’s fast steering, grippy but playful chassis, and its torquey engine meant it matched our benchmark, the Civic Type R, for performance, yet it just lacked a little of the Honda’s engagement and the shift quality of its beautiful six-speed box.

But the ST ticked all the other hot-hatch boxes; it was practical, reasonably efficient and had enough kit to feel hi-tech.

October 

SsangYong Korando vs Skoda Karoq

That SsangYong’s all-new mid-size SUV, the Korando, could be mentioned in the same breath as a class-leader like the Skoda Karoq showed how far the Korean brand had come – and a lot of that stemmed from the firm’s investment in its infotainment system. A big touchscreen with the latest phone compatibility and a digital dash helped offset the coarse engine and baggy ride.

MG ZS EV vs Nissan Leaf

Britain’s best affordable EV is a crown not without competition, and the MG ZS EV faced one of its toughest contenders to that title in the form of the Nissan Leaf.

But it emerged victorious thanks to its lower price tag yet a bigger battery that provided a better range. The two cars were closely matched on performance, with both offering similar power, but the ZS EV used less electricity.

The MG didn’t ride or handle brilliantly, while there were a few niggles that needed to be ironed out (the charging door flap was one of them), but the tech on offer for this price was hard to ignore. 

BMW 1 Series vs Golf and A-Class

Plenty of new BMWs were launched this year, but perhaps the most interesting was the 1 Series. The model had undergone a total revamp and was barely related to the car that came before it, so we put BMW’s all-new family hatch up against two key rivals.

There were two natural contenders: the Mercedes A-Class and the Volkswagen Golf. The former is an obvious competitor, with advanced in-car tech, downsized turbo petrol engines and an automatic gearbox in a premium-looking and feeling package. The Golf has been a strong performer since launch, and despite a replacement having been unveiled since, it was still a worthy rival.

These challengers were even more closely matched to the new 1 Series because it sends its power through the front wheels. Despite this, as we found out, the BMW retained its place as the best-handling car in the class, but it was also the most comfortable model in the test.

These key features, plus a hi-tech and upmarket cabin, low running costs and decent practicality, all combined to hand the BMW the win, with the comfortable, good-to-drive Golf second and the tech-filled Mercedes third.

November 

New Clio trounces Fiesta and Ibiza to take supermini honours

New superminis are always big news because they’re among the biggest-selling cars in the UK, thanks to buyers loving how they bring practicality and efficiency into a small, affordable and easy-to-drive package. So we were excited to see if the all-new Renault Clio would be able to take on two talented rivals: the Ford Fiesta and SEAT Ibiza.

With the Fiesta being Britain’s best-selling car and the Ibiza trading blows with it in various Auto Express group tests over the past few years, the Clio really had its work cut out in this competitive class – but the French car impressed first time out and drove away with the win.

There were several key areas that we focused on in this test: value for money, running costs and technology, with plenty of importance also placed on handling, ride comfort, practicality and safety. The fifth-generation Clio showed a big improvement in every area to take class honours.

With value being such an important factor, the Renault’s low price and good level of standard equipment put it in a strong position before we’d even driven it. Once we got inside it was clear that the Clio would also beat its rivals on cabin quality, with a new infotainment system that’s up to date and more usable, and comparable in-car tech.

The all-new interior impressed our testers, and with standard equipment including AEB, sat-nav, cruise control, LED lights and parking sensors even on our low-spec Iconic test car, it was very well equipped for the cash.

While the Clio’s rear-seat space left a bit to be desired, there was more room in its boot than in either the Fiesta or the Ibiza, and therefore plenty of practicality; 391 litres is more than enough for daily duties. And when we got the Renault out on British roads it became clear that the new French supermini also had the ride and handling balance to steal a win from its rivals. While the Fiesta is still the best-handling car in its class and delivers plenty of fun, and the Ibiza has a great engine and gearbox, the Renault rides more smoothly. For most buyers, this matters more, and it’s all the more impressive when you realise that the Ford and SEAT are by no means poor in this category.

The Clio’s 1.0-litre three-cylinder engine was more disappointing. It fell behind the Ford and SEAT in our acceleration tests, and felt a bit underpowered, but at least it was quiet and refined. This wasn’t enough to take away from the Renault’s appeal, though, and its good driving position helped add to its appeal.

All three of these models returned nearly identical fuel economy on test, so costs came down to finance and list price – and with the established models costing more than the newcomer, the Clio was able to hop ahead of the SEAT and finish in first place. 

Skoda Kamiq vs T-Cross and Aircross

The Skoda Kamiq shot straight to the top of the ultra-competitive compact SUV class when we tested it for the first time this year against the VW T-Cross and the Citroen C3 Aircross.

The Skoda’s hi-tech infotainment set-up and long list of standard kit helped it to secure the win. Under the skin the Kamiq uses the same platform, engine and gearbox as the T-Cross, and both SUVs were closely matched. There was plenty of space inside both, and a big boot, while the quiet but punchy 1.0-litre engine also proved a winner.

The C3 Aircross might have come third, but its cabin design and big, flexible boot drew praise.

Which was your favourite group test of 2019? Let us know your thoughts on the comments section below…

Review of the Year 2019

Best car news stories of 2019
Best car reviews of 2019
Best car group tests of 2019
Best long-term tests of 2019
Best motoring features of 2019
Best car videos of 2019
Best motorsport stories of 2019
Our highlights of 2019



from Featured Articles https://ift.tt/2PLSMk9

Friday, December 20, 2019

Nissan Juke review

https://ift.tt/2Mfm88B

For 
Quirky styling
Strong kit count
Engaging handling
Our Rating 
3
Against 
Poor ride comfort
Fiddly infotainment
Limited engine choice
Nissan Juke front
2019

The Nissan Juke is a vastly improved crossover, but it can’t rival the best cars in the small SUV class

The original Nissan Juke was a game-changer – it shaped the small SUV landscape forever, thanks to its quirky styling and characterful cabin. But while it took Nissan almost a decade to launch a new one, the second-generation car couldn’t replicate its predecessor’s winning formula. 

That’s partly because the market is now awash with talented rivals, but also due to the way the new car has been set up. The engineers have prioritised sharp handling, and as a result the Juke can feel a little brittle on UK roads. It’s bigger inside than before, but it’s still not the most practical model in its class. Limited engine choice and a long-throw manual gearbox cement its place just behind some seriously accomplished competition.

20 Dec, 2019
3.5

The second-generation Nissan Juke is clearly recognisable as an evolution of the original compact crossover. The car’s slim daytime running lights and oversized headlamps mimic the old version’s, while the pronounced haunches and hidden rear door handles are another nod to the original. It’s grown, but the benefit is an interior that is bigger in every direction.

Based on the same platform as the Renault Clio and Captur, the new Nissan Juke shares plenty of common parts with its French friends. The Captur is more intelligently packaged, however, offering things like a sliding rear bench and up to 536 litres of boot space. Still, there’s much to like about the Nissan’s interior, including a logically laid-out dashboard and lots of adjustment in the driver’s seat.

The Juke perhaps doesn’t feel as well built or high-quality as a Skoda Kamiq, but there’s loads of kit and the dials are easy to read. The large central touchscreen isn’t the most responsive, but at least you get physical shortcut buttons along the bottom of the screen, and you can use Apple CarPlay and Android Auto (Acenta and above) to bypass Nissan’s sub-standard infotainment set-up.

If you go for Tekna trim, you get Nissan’s Advanced Safety Shield. This offers various semi-autonomous features such as the firm’s Intelligent Around View Monitor, adaptive cruise control, autonomous emergency braking, blind spot monitoring and rear cross-traffic alert. In Tekna guise, the Juke will take care of the steering, accelerator and brakes, monitoring its surroundings for smooth motorway driving.

Elsewhere, even entry-level Visia cars get LED lights, a DAB radio, cruise control and traffic sign recognition. Acenta builds on this with 17-inch alloy wheels, a rear-view camera and Nissan’s eight-inch touchscreen with smartphone connectivity.

N-Connecta features keyless go, a leather trimmed steering wheel and climate control, while Tekna and Tekna+ pile on the kit with 19-inch wheels, a Bose stereo and a Heat Pack with heated seats and heated windscreen.

Sat-nav, stereo and infotainment

The Nissan Juke’s infotainment system isn’t as intuitive or as responsive as the best set-ups in the supermini class, but at least it’s packed with functionality; all but the very cheapest Visia model gets a touchscreen with Apple CarPlay and Android Auto.

We’d step up to at least the Acenta to get this kit. Doing so also gives you access to NissanConnect Services, as well as a useful (if slightly grainy) reversing camera. That rear window isn’t the biggest, so this could come in handy when parking in tight spots.

We love the Bose Personal Plus Audio System on Tekna and Tekna+ grade cars. This set-up features speakers set into the front headrests, which means you not only get a much clearer sound, but it’s less harmful to your hearing. The quality is really very good, and works well no matter what kind of music, radio or Podcast you like to listen to.

3

The new Nissan Juke has been tuned for UK roads, or, more specifically, on the roundabouts of Milton Keynes. The car’s engineers have worked hard to make the Juke more fun to drive, and in some ways they’ve achieved this. In others, not so much.

The Juke is based on the same small car platform as the latest Renault Clio and Captur, yet it drives quite differently. While the French siblings prioritise comfort, the Nissan feels much stiffer and more alert. Body control is excellent, but the trade off is a firm ride. The chassis is rigid, yet the Juke manages not to crash too terribly through bumps and potholes. It does fidget at higher speeds, however, with seemingly little suspension travel to soak up small imperfections in the road. Strangely, it didn’t seem any worse on the larger 19-inch wheels – so don’t avoid these purely in the pursuit of improved ride quality.

For a car of this type, the Juke does handle quite well. There’s very little roll in the bends and grip is good. The steering is light and doesn’t offer all that much feel, however, and the long-throw manual gearbox – and oddly spongy pedals – mean it’s not always that easy to drive smoothly.

We’ve got reservations over the single engine option, too. While it feels punchy enough around town, it can feel laggy, with a tendency to bog down if you try to pull away without many revs. The DCT auto is better in this regard, but it’s jerky at slow speeds and you might find it changing down a gear more often than you’d like – especially on steeper inclines.

Engines, 0-60 acceleration and top speed

At launch there’s only one engine for the Nissan Juke, although buyers do get a choice of manual or automatic transmissions. The latter adds around £1,400 to the car’s list price.

The 1.0-litre turbocharged three-cylinder petrol engine has 115bhp and 200Nm of torque, which pulls the Juke along with reasonable efficiency – but only if you keep the revs up. Officially, 0-62mph takes 10.4 seconds for the manual, or 11.1 seconds in the DCT auto, although our official tests (on the manual car) showed these numbers were hard to replicate. The long-throw gearbox and spongy pedals don’t help.

Still, the engine is relatively quiet, although there’s quite a bit of tyre noise – especially on the biggest 19-inch wheels. And despite its sleek body, wind noise can be an issue at higher speeds; rivals are quieter.

4.5

The latest Nissan Juke is a thoroughly modern small SUV that’s offered with an array of active safety and driver assistance systems: all models get an emergency call system, cruise control with speed limiter, automatic emergency braking, lane departure warning and traffic sign recognition.

Mid-range Tekna models add traffic jam and lane-keep assist, along with active cruise control, driver alertness monitoring, blind-spot warning and intervention, plus rear cross traffic alert and an extra Isofix point on the front passenger seat.

All this tech helped the Juke achieve an emphatic five-star rating from Euro NCAP, with 94 and 85 per cent ratings for adult and child occupant safety respectively. An 81 per cent rating in the Vulnerable Road Users category is impressive, while a 73 per cent Safety Assist rating helps bump up the overall score.

The latest Juke is too new to have featured in our Driver Power owner satisfaction survey but we’ve little reason to doubt its reliability or ownership experience. The old model managed a decent 27th-place finish in the 2019 Driver Power survey despite being almost a decade old; owners loved its safety features, styling, infotainment and reliability. Just 2.9 per cent of owners reported experiencing a fault – the lowest proportion of any car in the survey.

Warranty

All Nissan models are covered by a three-year, 60,000-mile warranty that’s a match for the identical warranties offered by Ford, Skoda and Volkswagen, amongst others. Hyundai’s five-year, unlimited-mileage warranty is still amongst the best, applied in this class to the great Kona SUV. Kia also beats most other manufacturers hands down with its seven-year, 100,000-mile offering on the Stonic.

Servicing

Service intervals are scheduled at every 12,500 miles or 12 months, whichever comes first. Fixed-price servicing deals are available and very easy to understand – for petrol models (the only Juke available currently) a minor service costs £209 and a major service will cost £289.

3.5

Despite its myriad specs, there is only one body style to choose from when specifying your new Nissan Juke. Every version gets five doors and five seats, plus a decent-sized boot and roomy cabin.

The driving position is far more adjustable than before; you sit low, and the steering wheel now moves fore and aft, as well as up and down. Visibility is fine out the front, but the small side windows and rear windscreen can make parking more of a challenge that it needs to be.

In terms of cabin storage, there are some large door bins and a sizeable glovebox, but the cubby between the front seats is only just big enough for a modern smartphone and the small area ahead of the gearlever is little better. In the back, there are another pair of door bins big enough for a 500ml bottle of water.

Size

The second-generation Nissan Juke is 35mm wider and 75mm longer than the original, and it certainly looks more imposing on the road thanks to its raised haunches and bulbous front end. However, at a little over 4.2m long, it’s slightly shorter than a Skoda Kamiq.

Leg room, head room & passenger space

Think of the Nissan Juke as an SUV equivalent of the firm’s Micra supermini, and you’ll get some idea of the space on offer. The boot is bigger, yes, but that sloping roofline means it feels quite dark and cramped in the back seats. That said, adults should be able to get comfortable, with enough headroom for those under six-feet tall.

Boot

The Nissan Juke’s boot is much bigger than before, and sizes up well in this class. However, while it shares a platform with the Renault Captur, it doesn’t get its trick sliding bench, so there’s no option to extend the 422-litre load bay without lowering the rear seats. Do so and you’ll create a 1,088-litre load area, which should be enough for most jobs.

Worthy of note is the Juke’s wider boot opening. The old model’s tailgate was shaped to make space for the rear light clusters, whereas the new car’s design splits them in two for improved practicality. There’s a moveable boot floor; in its highest setting you’ll sacrifice some space, but the flipside is that you won’t have to contend with any kind of nasty load lip.

The fixed parcel shelf attaches to the bootlid via a pair of strings and lifts out easily, although it feels super flimsy and there’s nowhere to store it. Wiggle it in, and there’s enough space for a road bike in the back.

3.5

The Nissan Juke is available with just one engine – a 1.0-litre three-cylinder with 115bhp. Emissions and fuel economy are largely dictated by gearbox type and wheel size; Nissan quotes 45.6–47.9mpg for the manual and 44.1–46.3mpg for the seven-speed dual-clutch automatic, while CO2 ranges from 110 to 118g/km, with the automatic the marginally cleaner option.

Company car users will be best served by the automatic thanks to those slightly lower emissions. In entry-level Acenta trim and with the automatic, CO2 sits at 110g/km, which equates to a 26 per cent BiK rate in the 2019/2020 tax year and 27 per cent in 2020/2021.

All models get stop/start as standard, as well as an Eco drive mode that helps save fuel – but you’ll notice a drop in performance as a result.

Insurance groups

The Juke is unlikely to break the bank in the insurance stakes; the car occupies groups 13 and 14 (out of 50). Insurance will be more expensive when larger engines are added to the range, however. Its Skoda Kamiq rival sits in groups 11 to 17 depending on engine choice.

Depreciation

Our experts predict that the Juke will retain around 47 to 50 per cent of its value after 36 months and 36,000 miles come trade-in time. By contrast, the closely related Renault Captur is expected to hold on to around 41 to 48 per cent over the same period.



from Featured Articles https://ift.tt/2ED7nYX